As
Jesus sat at the table, a woman came with an alabaster jar of very costly
ointment of nard, and she broke open the jar and poured the ointment on Jesus’
head (Mark 14:3).
We will
look at this act, both in comparison to the other people mentioned in the text,
and also in its own right. This, I believe, teaches us a lot about worship. This is
an incident covered in all four Gospels. There are differences in the various
accounts, as you would expect when the information comes from different
witnesses (and has passed for decades through the oral tradition). But the
central point is the same in each case. A woman makes a sacrificial act of
worship towards Jesus, which others do not understand, or oppose outright, but
Jesus highly commends.
We see
clearly in Mark the contrast in approaches to Jesus. One woman did an
extraordinary thing, a beautiful act of worship. Surrounding this are some very
different responses and attitudes to this woman’s particular act. This
passage asks me, ‘How much do I want to worship Jesus’? And, ‘Is there anything
holding me back’?
The
passage starts with the reminder that “the chief priests and the scribes” were
looking for a way to arrest and kill Jesus. This was outright rejection. The
passage we have read concludes with Judas deciding to betray Jesus (and help
the “chief priests” with their plot). And in
the middle were the detractors – those who couldn’t understand or couldn’t
accept such a worshipful act, or perhaps couldn’t see themselves acting
anything like this woman did. We’ll come back to this.
The
woman herself, we suspect, was a woman whom Jesus had previously ministered to
– Luke, in his version, calls this woman a “sinner” … which was probably code
for a prostitute, while John, in his version, says she is Mary, sister of
Martha and Lazarus. Thus she was probably a woman who had encountered Jesus on
an earlier occasion, been ministered to … and gratefulness had welled up in her
(gratefulness that now spilled over). How do we show our gratefulness?
This
woman entered the house where Jesus was, and while Jesus was eating at the
table, broke open a bottle of very expensive perfume, and poured this lovingly
over Jesus’ head. I like in John’s version the comment, that following the
anointing of Jesus, “The house was filled with the fragrance of
perfume” (John 12:3b).
The
“alabaster jar” (v.3) was an elaborate vessel, with a long neck, made from
expensive Egyptian marble. The contents were a fine fragrant imported perfume
(probably made from the root of a rare plant found in India). The value is
suggested to be at least three hundred denarii – equivalent to around a full
year’s salary!! Thus you would expect that this perfume would normally have
been used quite sparingly!!
But on
this day, a fresh bottle was broken open, and the whole contents were used in
one go! None of the perfume was held back! Is this our response to Jesus? Or
would we be more liable to measure this out a little? Would we be more likely
to consider what was more convenient or conventional? We will refer later to
the depth of what this woman was indicating by this act. But returning now to
the detractors …
How did
some of the other dinner guests react?? In terms of ‘waste’. A ‘waste’ in
relation to how the worth of the perfume could have been used to help the poor.
Or, were the poor more of an afterthought, or an excuse, and they really
thought it was just a waste giving this much attention to Jesus. The woman’s
action could have just been seen as strange, unusual or even irrational, and
out of these people’s comfort zones. And certainly they were unable to see
beyond the act itself to its deeper meaning.
Just
jumping ahead to clarify something – Jesus' reply concerning “the poor” in
verse 7 … “for you always have the poor with you”, has been often misused to
suggest that this is sort of a fait accompli – that this is something we should
just accept and not worry about. This is of course not what Jesus is
saying at all. Jesus is saying that we can care for the poor anytime (and of
course on the basis of Jesus’ general teaching we should care for the poor at
all times). It’s just that right now, in this moment, Jesus can be served,
while the moment exists. It’s not either/or, but both!! I reckon Jesus
would wholly endorse Deuteronomy 15:11, which reads, “Since there will never
cease to be some in need on the earth, I therefore command you, ‘Open your hand
to the poor and needy neighbour in your land'.”
In
John’s version of this story, Judas is named as the one who was most concerned
about this ‘waste’. Mark leaves it to later to identify that Judas was
displeased about the nature of this act of worship. Why would this have really
been a problem for Judas? John (12:5f) tells us that it was Judas who said,
“Why was this perfume not sold for three hundred denarii and the money given to
the poor”? But then John comments, “He said this not because he cared about the
poor, but because he was a thief; he kept the common purse and used to steal what
was put into it”. What was Judas’ problem?? He had a problem maybe with money,
or selfish motives! Maybe, he was disappointed that Jesus was not attending to his
agenda? Maybe his unresolved issues were keeping him on the fringe of things?
Maybe Judas was unwilling to undergo the sort of personal transformation and
growth that would’ve kept him on track? Maybe he hadn’t let himself get to know
Jesus well enough?
[It
could be that the other disciples were being more than accommodating with
Judas, possibly knowing what was happening with the common purse, but still
trying to keep Judas within their number.]
As an
aside, we might wonder what other dinner guests thought … the ones who hadn’t
said anything? How do we react to lavish outbursts of worship from others?
We are
told that particular guests … the ‘detractors’ … “scolded” the woman!!! Fancy
being scolded for such a beautiful act! How hurtful! How discouraging!! Here
displayed was a ‘critical spirit’, which was almost abusive, and certainly
unwelcoming. Fortunately Jesus was present to override this discouragement with
warm words of support. Jesus confronted them about unnecessarily bringing
trouble to this woman.
Let’s
look more closely at this woman’s beautiful act of worship. How would you
describe it??? Some might say ‘outrageous’ or ‘extravagant’, but meant
hopefully in a good way. Radical! Elaborate and unbridled! Pure and
uncomplicated! There was no hidden agenda. It was unmeasured – there was no
weighing up. Spontaneous, and trusting!! Just like the children Jesus used as
an example of natural recipients of God’s Kingdom (Mark 10:15). Repentant!
There was a thoroughness, a wholeheartedness; such love and devotion! All the
sort of descriptions that our worship should have.
Lest we
think that the dripping wet Jesus didn’t appreciate what the woman did … Jesus
called this act (verse 6b) … “a good service for me”. The Greek word translated
here as “good” could also be translated ‘beautiful, useful, precious,
desirable’, leading to the NIV translation – “She has done a beautiful thing to
me”. This certainly rises way above mere duty. This woman did the best that
she could with the best that she had! This woman did all that she could
with all that she had!!
The
most specific “service” she offered was anointing Jesus’ body before his death
and burial. It was customary for the dead to be prepared like this for burial;
just like the women were seeking to do later when they found Jesus’ body
missing from his tomb. The exception would be someone crucified as a criminal –
they would not normally be anointed for burial. This also resembled the
traditional anointing of a ‘king’. So, what did this woman understand that
others had not seen? That Jesus was to be the Saviour of the world! That Jesus
was a Servant King! This was worship as testimony … testimony to the One being
worshipped! This woman was acknowledging that what Jesus was about to endure
was on her behalf; and she was announcing her commitment to him. [Maybe she
didn’t fully know the implications or meaning of what she was doing, but humbly followed anyway, whatever intuition or leading she had.]
As part
of his defense of the woman, Jesus said, “… you will not always have me”
(v.7b). This was true … Jesus would be crucified within a week of this event.
What does this mean for us do you think?? We shouldn’t take our opportunities
of worship lightly or for granted.
Jesus
said that the story of this beautiful act of worship would be “told in
remembrance of her”. It would be remembered and noted well for its importance.
But Mark’s Gospel doesn’t identify this woman by name! Perhaps it was the
actual act that was most important – that it happened – and that it could have
been any of us!
No comments:
Post a Comment